From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 17 00:56:02 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA10348 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 00:56:02 -0700 Received: from hq.icb.chel.su (icb-rich-gw.icb.chel.su [193.125.10.34]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA10332 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 00:55:10 -0700 Received: from localhost (babkin@localhost) by hq.icb.chel.su (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA02614; Mon, 17 Apr 1995 13:41:49 -0500 From: "Serge A. Babkin" Message-Id: <199504171841.NAA02614@hq.icb.chel.su> Subject: Re: support for Xircom PCMCIA Ethernet adapters? To: hosokawa@mt.cs.keio.ac.jp (HOSOKAWA Tatsumi) Date: Mon, 17 Apr 1995 13:41:48 -0500 (GMT-0500) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199504170522.OAA13653@remington.mt.cs.keio.ac.jp> from "HOSOKAWA Tatsumi" at Apr 17, 95 02:22:19 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 762 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I heard that the president of Xircom hates free software by > philosophycal reasons. They protect device driver from > reverse-engineering by encrypting the drivers, and I heard that they ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ But how ? IMO the Unix driver is an object file that can't be encrypted itself and probably can't contain the encrypted part decryptable by xxinit(). > won't give us any hardware information without exclusive contracts. Do they have a driver for SCO ? Decompiling of SCO drivers isn't very difficult because SCO's optimizer is bad (and often isn't used at all) and disassembler is included in the Development System. Serge Babkin ! (babkin@hq.icb.chel.su) ! Headquarter of Joint Stock Commercial Bank "Chelindbank" ! Chelyabinsk, Russia