From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 10 06:10:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BDB884 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA14A2138 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f171.google.com with SMTP id hm2so9441810wib.4 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:10:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=6Rb8jmd2jknUhNykvmxb+RsQPrQP2mBXxQ/2xlLq5O0=; b=dDs1EcS+NewuUAiTy9VqXaA/d01lGTe0LjXRdVC1+r9oERjwLKgb6aKFF/fR8WsxSb MhASaDxNLRnktbGxQkrMCmsE+/PnTDVR6lmjuUcntkLi+mrovGHzTXBDgtVUs23QV+7v z/exzpRw/7QVGUFIKfL8epMZl3NTZRTsdbq8tdJGLTKGxsYD2VCw+pGAMGGHzK6q3KPJ fstxQ/4Z3iJN8iHLrgy62h7R5q8Zg8ffRZ3YJGDcG8rPaOLCbPjc4quHtbQ8v6J4z4ht DgvaB7jt3w0W8Iq/NgbMLN1UNg9/T1XKN6OmSTmGaQ8HtgsEolYIzgaaarkR5IEfDO3b +5xg== X-Received: by 10.180.10.136 with SMTP id i8mr6109542wib.46.1381385448969; Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm22157557wiz.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 08:10:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: perl@FreeBSD.org Subject: With or without .packlist? Message-ID: <20131010061045.GP16964@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 06:10:51 -0000 --b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi guys, With the staging support, we can properly decide what we do pack or not inside the packages, the question now is do we keep the .packlist (in that case they need to be fixed because they are full of stage path :)) or should we just drop those files and no package them at all. It seems to me that most of the other operating systems are not packaging. I have no clue what what those .packlist files are useful for, so I do have no opinion, would be nice to get a perl@ claim on this soon, as we either need to fix them or nuke them. btw: sunpoet has a PR I'm sitting one because of that: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/182806 regards, Bapt --b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlJWROUACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EygvACgjL3dK2dWRfArpxL5dQ/EmRK2 VZEAn2soebpWkdswSf2UEnA1CcUkh3LC =nbdq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --b5sSX5qSQrSInIHt--