From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 20 21:25:31 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA8A321C;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:25:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7698D662;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:25:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by wiun10 with SMTP id n10so107234242wiu.1;
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=G5NBfn+u03Zdf81gPvgH17MBIThAdSC9cgGtECLYaeQ=;
 b=l11sTyXhlRj2sSHwEYcCnrOkpLNuK2JiyFKuKwrRP4EpbGhHkUhnJfBDKNrESD+lr1
 CjN/Czj0QNCOadQlr60G96AcvHGH67r1oIr7FsRSttyiFSWerpx2BF3YLxRWUVioF1rq
 RLIExQuBO861sh9X+m9i9J4QEv0G+Uz0/uq2Dl8ft/GtERsf3cTjwJxqIN8/wMa2p7nI
 Y/QASXSCpYJbwE0so1g4SmExwx606fnE66iQbmgBK5W2YlWV4jGMyFh+Tyl+WEwQt/A/
 7Y4NW+v3sKYUUZjDbeAr7/nSC0nGwiugl8fuMUYhazHp6oHxluWk81O2zSv+2rUqGeUd
 PaxA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.104.137 with SMTP id ge9mr29625940wib.24.1429565129111; 
 Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.80.202 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 14:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150420162149.GE2390@kib.kiev.ua>
References: <20150420162149.GE2390@kib.kiev.ua>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:25:29 +0300
Message-ID: <CAE-mSO+gEFFRio4P3157NcSoNOpf9JifH98WqKgi9TmBu6hgvw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Move x86 idle code to the x86/ common place.
From: Sergey Kandaurov <pluknet@gmail.com>
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc: arch@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 21:25:32 -0000

On 20 April 2015 at 19:21, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
[..]
> +struct {
> +       void    *id_fn;
> +       char    *id_name;
> +} idle_tbl[] = {
> +       { cpu_idle_spin, "spin" },
> +       { cpu_idle_mwait, "mwait" },
> +       { cpu_idle_hlt, "hlt" },
> +#if !defined(__i386__) || !defined(PC98)
> +       { cpu_idle_acpi, "acpi" },
> +#endif
> +       { NULL, NULL }
> +};
> +

I believe this conditional could be left unchanged as #ifndef PC98
(also in several other places), given that pc98 may not be present
other than under i386.  Otherwise, looks good.

-- 
wbr,
pluknet