From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 15 20:41:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6DB16A4CF; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:41:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF4343D3F; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8FKdGnm064512; Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:39:16 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 14:40:01 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040915.144001.112981466.imp@bsdimp.com> To: green@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20040915200627.GF36708@green.homeunix.org> References: <20040915152822.GD36708@green.homeunix.org> <20040915.134918.51856331.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040915200627.GF36708@green.homeunix.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: phk@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/isa isa_dma.c src/sys/amd64/isa isa_dma.c src/sys/i386/isa isa_dma.c src/sys/ia64/isa isa_dma.c src/sys/pc98/pc98 isa_dma.c src/sys/isa isavar.h src/sys/vm vm_page.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 20:41:18 -0000 In message: <20040915200627.GF36708@green.homeunix.org> Brian Fundakowski Feldman writes: : > I have patches, improved by Tor and phk, that move the acquisision of : > the dma buffer to attach. : > : > The problem is that 40k isn't too big, but 40k below 16MB is very hard : > after boon on large memory machines due to the amount of RAM allocated : > in the boot process. : : Well, 40kb below 16MB _during_boot_ shouldn't be too hard, certainly : more so with large memory machines though, indeed... The larger the memory, the more there seems to be allocated during the boot process, so it disappears relatively early on. Warner