From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 11 20: 0: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C6F37B502 for ; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id UAA69824; Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 20:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010120300.UAA69824@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "James E. Housley" Subject: Re: ports/20668: new port: databases/db3 (Berkeley DB rev.3) Reply-To: "James E. Housley" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/20668; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "James E. Housley" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, osa@FreeBSD.org.ru Cc: Subject: Re: ports/20668: new port: databases/db3 (Berkeley DB rev.3) Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 22:50:45 -0400 How is this different from the existing ports/databases/db3 port? Should this just be closed? Jim -- James E. Housley Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature to help me spread! <- Save this lifeform ;-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message