Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 19:12:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213768] editors/libreoffice: Fix build with lang/gcc5 on 11.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <bug-213768-25061-UOwf8KuKJh@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213768-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213768-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213768 --- Comment #15 from Kenneth Salerno <kennethsalerno@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Jung-uk Kim from comment #14) Thank you. I know gcc5 isn't officially supported to compile ports, it just produces much better binaries compared to clang (anyone impressed with how = fast clang can produce binaries should think about how many optimization passes = its missing compared with gcc...). I'm attaching my make.conf so you see how I needed to get around certain is= sues without patching any of the other ports besides devel/liborcus and editors/libreoffice to successfully build 1,065 ports with lang/gcc5. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213768-25061-UOwf8KuKJh>