From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Sep 6 13: 3:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892A937B424 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 13:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nlsys.demon.co.uk ([158.152.125.33] helo=herring.nlsystems.com) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 13WlPd-000AtU-0V; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:03:13 +0100 Received: from salmon.nlsystems.com (salmon.nlsystems.com [10.0.0.3]) by herring.nlsystems.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA03992; Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:04:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2000 21:04:12 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: mjacob@feral.com, John Baldwin , alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: what was the last patch you sent out? In-Reply-To: <14773.14047.750044.76586@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Matthew Jacob writes: > > > > Well, Rawhide boots. I sure wish I knew what the authors intended by saying > > "physical bus". I don't seems quite correct since we seem to have two > > I think its trying to map back to the DEQ SRM terminology where you > can have a "bus 0" on many different hoses. Eg, its directly tied > to the nexus & not behind a ppb. > > Does that make sense? This should be exactly what we have. > > > > different "physical bus" zeros here. On puropose I very carefully don't have > > overlapping cards (as in, same slot, different busses). > > Actually, that would be the most interesting to test. It ought to work fine. -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 20 8348 3944 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message