From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 8 12:40:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D7616A4E0 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc3-cmbg1-0-0-cust506.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [82.21.101.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3778843D70 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2006 12:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.63 #0) id 1GAQsl-00069B-4f by authid for ; Tue, 08 Aug 2006 13:40:27 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:40:26 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20060808124026.GB22725@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Portsnap && CVSup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2006 12:40:58 -0000 --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:22:11AM -0400, Anthony Agelastos wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > I am wondering how well Portsnap plays with CVSup. As an example, =20 > let's say that I accidentally deleted a Port folder (/usr/ports/print/=20 > hplip as an example), I assume the best way of bringing it back would =20 > be CVSup and not Portsnap. Is this thinking correct? After using =20 > CVSup, is there anything that I need to do to for Portsnap to know =20 > what else has been updated? Any information on this is greatly =20 > appreciated. Thank you. Probably the easiest way out of this is to # portsnap extract print/hplip and not use cvsup at all. =20 HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE2IY6ixf5fBYiFmoRAtl0AKCZNqYWLjBtg0W4h26/aqXjrLMt7QCgthfb Uo9Ts/8eU3cUCJZJ85gUnKQ= =9u2e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb--