Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 13:40:26 +0100 From: Daniel Bye <freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> To: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Portsnap && CVSup Message-ID: <20060808124026.GB22725@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <D1340D7A-1B0C-4FF4-8387-A97F2F0FCD10@gmail.com> References: <D1340D7A-1B0C-4FF4-8387-A97F2F0FCD10@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 07:22:11AM -0400, Anthony Agelastos wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > I am wondering how well Portsnap plays with CVSup. As an example, =20 > let's say that I accidentally deleted a Port folder (/usr/ports/print/=20 > hplip as an example), I assume the best way of bringing it back would =20 > be CVSup and not Portsnap. Is this thinking correct? After using =20 > CVSup, is there anything that I need to do to for Portsnap to know =20 > what else has been updated? Any information on this is greatly =20 > appreciated. Thank you. Probably the easiest way out of this is to # portsnap extract print/hplip and not use cvsup at all. =20 HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: http://www.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey-dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE2IY6ixf5fBYiFmoRAtl0AKCZNqYWLjBtg0W4h26/aqXjrLMt7QCgthfb Uo9Ts/8eU3cUCJZJ85gUnKQ= =9u2e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060808124026.GB22725>