From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Dec 10 16:05:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA06614 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:05:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable) Received: from pop.uniserve.com (pop.uniserve.com [204.244.156.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA06606 for ; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 16:05:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.com [204.244.210.252] by pop.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xfvek-0003ib-00; Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:35:07 -0800 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 1997 15:35:04 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: "Brent J. Nordquist" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Header not found building F00F patch under 2.2.5 In-Reply-To: <199712102153.PAA25829@bigbert.vt.platinum.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 10 Dec 1997, Brent J. Nordquist wrote: > I subscribe to the -current mailing list, but I haven't seen this one > go by. Because it belongs on -stable > I am running the stock 2.2.5 release. I saw the security notification > (1) Checking out from CVS the revs mentioned in the patch for the three > files that were affected. > (2) Completely checking out RELENG_2_2_5_RELEASE from CVS and, > (2a) applying the patch or > (2b) checking out the revs from CVS. > > All procduce identical results. dmake depend on the kernel is also > complaining for all three of the affected files. > > Any suggestions on what I should try next? Check out RELENG_2_2. The patch seems to have been made versus 2.2.5-stable, so: 2.2.5-stable = 2.2.5-RELEASE + patches + F0 patch You can get 2.2.5-stable by just using the RELENG_2_2 branch. Tom