From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org Wed Oct 26 09:23:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10920C1FD57 for ; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAAAA9B2; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 140so9856735wmv.0; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:23:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=TdNnyAxhJvxMGTVAwZGuNheBoAaCOjkHiYG/eCSmkMU=; b=dt1PP9pSwVlDcwLiGM7QS3rUe/9pXvjHaVPYUV9LxC9tCalQQaVcCA3YOeOlnxOu4d k2dWd1LCYN1txfuyVE4bNPvaTl/xUwacOuA8Ba6iEaUgA10a1g3zmnVqzI4/dn5cFYJ0 E6V5yw3gm8r113/CwI7CNqfH4yS63SIKPwe59UkSmZNhW66CdrLI3uG0ogfBifCzm8mm cDzdoKqpEQNrxMtERbqoBEHpaw69uPaaIt9Yfat5dX+nwAk50eVgO46pHFVlWtUGXUbu ewMk0D5Ett/GfV4H9xZSRIuuo88MM8Rjkhx7YLEVD59lhIQyJQzRhwfgiDJwXd8EMA5N y92A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=TdNnyAxhJvxMGTVAwZGuNheBoAaCOjkHiYG/eCSmkMU=; b=iHj+ePRriF3T8hIx/iiu+wZA2k9b8RAioMmUIJmM0ap4Kw59siM/nc5FG4ehhwbcdN 0yR9Cvs+pBiFA2MmHE3RcL8qr+pNw7WQ5pZOfn+qCy2v7kMYgClM5o90fFLGWlop7kWw 0P23tAYHcZoz9LIlW7Wnba2cNRXbGP6w6GaEUHAG+qLw05xGE+56uaYODK6tTOIer13K pn+njC86gtMH8l1QS2yyk9+mJtQr7aK28Y7zFdDvcZJODpgESt03aEjk4wIYa+0lMdX9 15+0/P3kh8h29WkbZ3QJgo/5awKG94Mhbl6mrgoelK3DCYWspZnFHR57vnq6KC6/recU RAog== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvcOYPcBVAz5Ov1PUOwMOEOrp4Zj5yg5FQJNyLeNO7GXkO2Pql9z30XaQCEx7QFLB9Vzv/V3XkrYWUaBGg== X-Received: by 10.194.24.34 with SMTP id r2mr1231685wjf.111.1477473785419; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:23:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.28.178.132 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Oct 2016 02:22:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0717BEFA-4E65-4990-AC50-FD80681C110C@FreeBSD.org> References: <20161025173641.BCDFD1911@freefall.freebsd.org> <20161026042748.GG60006@garage.freebsd.pl> <20161026061504.GH60006@garage.freebsd.pl> <0717BEFA-4E65-4990-AC50-FD80681C110C@FreeBSD.org> From: CeDeROM Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 11:22:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: okQivMhtwqVWDRx-V_vQLND7Zww Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-16:15.sysarch [REVISED] To: "Robert N. M. Watson" Cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek , freebsd-security@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 09:23:08 -0000 On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 8:53 AM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: > In general, my strong recommendation is against issuing advisories for local denial-of-service attacks, (..) I would prefer to get that information regardless of individual preferences.. SA tells there is a problem that is at least good to know about. -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info