From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mon Feb 13 13:23:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F15BCDBCA4 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638DA1D56 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v1DDNRmx034530 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:23:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217069] Performance: memcpy slower in Xscale vs ARM Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:23:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: arm X-Bugzilla-Version: CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alexandre.martins@stormshield.eu X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 13:23:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217069 Bug ID: 217069 Summary: Performance: memcpy slower in Xscale vs ARM Product: Base System Version: CURRENT Hardware: arm OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: arm Assignee: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Reporter: alexandre.martins@stormshield.eu Hello, During the development for our new platform, armada380 based, I see that the "standard" version of memmove/memcpy is faster than the "xscale" one. For that, I just remove the _ARM_ARCH_5E define into the file sys/arm/arm/support.S. There is the results: Block size: 2048 memcpy (Kernel ARM) : 1028.7 MB/s memmove (Kernel ARM) : 616.5 MB/s memcpy (Kernel xscale) : 920.1 MB/s memmove (Kernel xscale) : 618.8 MB/s Block size: 128 memcpy (Kernel ARM) : 1018.5 MB/s memmove (Kernel ARM) : 668.4 MB/s memcpy (Kernel xscale) : 825.9 MB/s memmove (Kernel xscale) : 668.6 MB/s Block size: 64 memcpy (Kernel ARM) : 892.9 MB/s memmove (Kernel ARM) : 667.2 MB/s memcpy (Kernel xscale) : 721.2 MB/s memmove (Kernel xscale) : 668.2 MB/s Block size: 32 memcpy (Kernel ARM) : 620.6 MB/s memmove (Kernel ARM) : 634.6 MB/s memcpy (Kernel xscale) : 504.9 MB/s memmove (Kernel xscale) : 634.5 MB/s Block size: 16 memcpy (Kernel ARM) : 471.8 MB/s memmove (Kernel ARM) : 464.5 MB/s memcpy (Kernel xscale) : 254.5 MB/s memmove (Kernel xscale) : 464.7 MB/s Please note that the userland suffer the same problem, and the standard "AR= M" is a little bit more efficient. I'm available to test any point you want. Best regards Alexandre Martins --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=