From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 29 9:18:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75AC11502B for ; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:18:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whistle.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA65682; Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:14:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 09:14:05 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: "Roman V. Palagin" Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of 'tee' firewall action In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Unfortunatly the 'tee' option is quite a bit more complicated than it looks.this is because teh normal way that packets get to divert sockets and the way it'd have to get there from a 'tee' are kinda incompatible. It can be done but it's just not quite as straight forward as it first appears.. julian On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Roman V. Palagin wrote: > Hello! > > What the status of 'tee' action? Anybody working on it? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Roman V. Palagin | RVP1-6BONE, RP40-RIPE | Network Administrator > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message