From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 30 13:10:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.umiacs.umd.edu (leviathan.umiacs.umd.edu [128.8.120.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8DF37B401 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:10:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from leviathan.umiacs.umd.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leviathan.umiacs.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA13104; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:09:59 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200110302109.QAA13104@leviathan.umiacs.umd.edu> To: Archie Cobbs Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Reply Hazy (Encrypted VPN across FBSD, W2k, RHL, etc...) In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:56:56 PST." <200110302056.f9UKuuv08305@arch20m.dellroad.org> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 16:09:59 -0500 From: Gary Jackson Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Archie Cobbs wrote: >That's only required if you want to do compression, which is optional. >So the net/mpd-netgraph port will do PPTP with encryption but not >compression. Ah, cool. >> Option (2) looks even less likely. I've only been able to find one >> implementation of l2tp, and it looks like it's still a pretty flaky >> piece of software that hasn't been integrated with IPSec. > >You can configure Win2k to do pure IPSec without the L2TP part, >and this works with FreeBSD/IPSec/racoon. Search the MSoft knowledge >base for how to configure it this way (it's non-trivial). I think I'll probably stick to the PPTP method, since I may try and pitch this to my boss at some point. I'll take a look at IPSec without L2TP mechanism, though. Thanks for the help! -- Gary Jackson bargle@umiacs.umd.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message