From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 19:54:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A76816A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:54:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE3243D5C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lydianconcepts@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so539769rnf for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:54:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=G1NLfZABrsC9ktNBHLUQYVS7dN9mEZ0btb5VBN9SPrZSTJa6ZX79kH83BNlLZ3xlqWocMqi5rI+ecm1DhCP8Fwj2sGWjXFgi/nKWrxzbMUM1QjEiH+WfSaHhWt7+bT0yYQ6JmRW/vxJ97Oe4YQ8ixLjvrRXO3TDCjxakYqYDG1I= Received: by 10.38.171.65 with SMTP id t65mr196504rne; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:54:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.104.14 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:54:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7579f7fb050222115474f8edef@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:54:07 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob To: Morten Liebach In-Reply-To: <20050222084330.GA19901@mongers.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050221155422.GB3746@mongers.org> <20050221162947.GA67330@dan.emsphone.com> <20050222084330.GA19901@mongers.org> cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: Dan Nelson cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Qlogic ISP 2200, DL-380 and EVA 5000 SAN; how? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthew Jacob List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 19:54:09 -0000 > > These things look OK, we have both Linux, Windows and HP-UX hosts on the > same SAN with the same setup for them. Can you clue us in on the actual lun setup exported by the array? Or give us a /proc/scsi/scsi output dump? Can you tell us the connection topology other than "same SAN"? > > LUN 0 looks like it's just a management LUN. A disk device would come > > up as "Direct Access", not "Storage Array". > > Thanks, and have a nice day > Morten Sure- we'll try! Hopefully you too!