From owner-freebsd-qa Tue Dec 18 10:20:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3DF37B416; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:20:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20011218182031.JDRH20122.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:20:31 +0000 Received: (from bmah@localhost) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBIIKVd22780; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:20:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah) Message-Id: <200112181820.fBIIKVd22780@bmah.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: John Baldwin Cc: qa@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should we test cdboot on 4.5 RC's? In-Reply-To: References: Comments: In-reply-to John Baldwin message dated "Mon, 17 Dec 2001 15:46:14 -0800." From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@acm.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1551936902P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 10:20:30 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-qa@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_1551936902P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, John Baldwin wrote: > Hmm, does anyone else think it might be worthwhile to MFC the new cdboot > replacement for the broken cdldr code in 4.x. If cdldr is broken anyways, sure, why not? > Then for the RC's we chould ship > two versions of each ISO, one with cdboot as the bootable image and the other > with boot.flp so we can have people test it and see how if cdboot works on mo > st > computers or not? The only difference in the ISO's is what image is set as > bootable on the mkisofs command line, other than that the images would both > have the same exact file contents. Note: There's some Makefile targets now in src/release that do mkisofs invocation. More tweakable knobs for the Makefile...yum! Bruce. --==_Exmh_1551936902P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE8H4ju2MoxcVugUsMRArDsAJ9kbmugn5Rnc97Jb9dro2owD2HPZQCg+uDP 9k9ccMlO6BKw8lQHR7rjgww= =1VST -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1551936902P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message