Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:53:59 -0400 From: Gwendolyn <gwen@nvnsvch.org> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: w3m ... ok, and lynx (was Re: ARRGH Netscape stinks!) Message-ID: <20010716195359.A45217@nvnsvch.org> In-Reply-To: <20010716175043.A21573@moo.holy.cow>; from parv_@yahoo.com on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 05:50:43PM -0400 References: <20010716090154.C1384@sjt-u10.cisco.com> <20010716102010.A19358@acadia.ne.mediaone.net> <20010716172625.B44718@nvnsvch.org> <20010716175043.A21573@moo.holy.cow>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* parv (parv_@yahoo.com) [010716 17:50]: > > just wondering ... why would you prefer lynx over w3m, for remote > usage, given both were available? I'm generally using screen when connected remotely, and for some reason I (and a friend of mine) have formatting problems when using w3m in screen windows. I'm not sure if that's a result of the version of w3m or screen that I'm using on my home system, but right now it's just not working. It doesn't phase me too much, since I ssh -X anyway... > i must admit i haven't used lynx in about 1-2 year(s) since switching to > w3m. I stopped using lynx until they started patching up their security holes again... now I'll use it when on remote systems or work systems (which don't often have w3m installed... yet). -- gwen. Systems Adminstrator, pair Networks, Inc. http://www.gw3n.com/ same bloody difference though; one long, slightly-varying season & millions of morons who think life revolves around juice bars & jogging on fault lines -- Hyper Jeff, on Seattle and San Francisco To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010716195359.A45217>