Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:09:46 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r220736 - head/sbin/natd Message-ID: <4DACB6AA.2030407@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4DACB13B.9070306@FreeBSD.org> References: <201104170605.p3H65cab028890@svn.freebsd.org> <20110418181314.GL16958@FreeBSD.org> <BANLkTimCdHqdn2672cXDWqECUnSc4hV38Q@mail.gmail.com> <4DACB13B.9070306@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/18/2011 2:46 PM, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Well, as I already said I don't see any problem with natd waiting on > interface to get IP address in all cases. This is no better or no worse > than just bailing out, except it will make things working automatically > once IP address has been provisioned. Garrett, Gleb, One way to resolve this would be to add a new flag for the natd, which will enable the new behaviour and set that flag from the rc.d/natd, so anybody else who relies on the natd exiting on no address condition can have it as well. What do you think? -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DACB6AA.2030407>