From owner-freebsd-bugs  Mon Sep 30 15:40:07 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA14359
          for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA14330;
          Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199609302240.PAA14330@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: Bill Paul <wpaul>
Subject: Re: bin/1693: rarpd does not appear to work
Reply-To: Bill Paul <wpaul>
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/1693; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bill Paul <wpaul>
To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner)
Cc: graphix@iastate.edu, freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/1693: rarpd does not appear to work
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 1996 15:37:01 -0700 (PDT)

 > 
 > In message <199609300225.TAA05929@freefall.freebsd.org> you write:
 > >Would it be possible to replace our rarpd with NetBSD's or OpenBSD's?
 > 
 > I think a better thing to do would be to replace it with an updated
 > version from ftp.ee.lbl.gov, where it originally came from.  Bill Paul
 > had been talking about doing this; Bill, are you still planning on this?
 > 
 >   Bill
 > 
 
 I started playing with it last night, actually. However I need to
 rummage around for a spare Sun CPU that I can test with. The updated
 version from the bpf distribution actually compiles without any
 modifications on FreeBSD, but I can't confirm that it works just yet.
 
 -Bill