Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:41:51 -0800 From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> Cc: freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/freebsd-gcc9@powerpc (for example) : it has the clang vs. gcc vec_step name conflict (for powerpc families): build fails under clang Message-ID: <70ace2dc-ab93-3fee-8ecf-019730195d5a@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <D9EFE02F-E9C4-4F78-9FFE-842938C10F13@yahoo.com> References: <BE95732C-A03D-47D6-969B-78966768AD5E.ref@yahoo.com> <BE95732C-A03D-47D6-969B-78966768AD5E@yahoo.com> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1912271441380.3227@anthias> <D9EFE02F-E9C4-4F78-9FFE-842938C10F13@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/26/19 11:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >>> is missing the patch-clang-vec_step that is in: >>> >>> FBSDG5L2# ls -laT /usr/ports/lang/gcc9/files/ >> >> That is a hack that can be used to work around the issue; I strongly >> recommend addressing this in clang properly, though. I think using the hack patch in devel/freebsd-gcc* is fine for now, but can you confirm if both 6 and 9 need it or only 9? -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70ace2dc-ab93-3fee-8ecf-019730195d5a>