From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jul  5 00:50:02 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39762570;
 Fri,  5 Jul 2013 00:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from glewis@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6D11753;
 Fri,  5 Jul 2013 00:50:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r650o27H005462;
 Fri, 5 Jul 2013 00:50:02 GMT
 (envelope-from glewis@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from glewis@localhost)
 by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r650o2H1005461;
 Fri, 5 Jul 2013 00:50:02 GMT (envelope-from glewis)
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 00:50:02 GMT
Message-Id: <201307050050.r650o2H1005461@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: jgh@FreeBSD.org, glewis@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
From: glewis@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/179801: [patch] jdk16 is deprecated,
 reflect within documentation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
 <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:50:02 -0000

Synopsis: [patch] jdk16 is deprecated, reflect within documentation

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: glewis
State-Changed-When: Fri Jul 5 00:47:38 UTC 2013
State-Changed-Why: 
Committed, thanks.

I agree there is more updating working to be done here.  Couple of notes:

1. This gets rid of references to a removed port and likely also stops people
from jumping through hoops and coming asking for the patchsets for it.  I
think that alone is good enough to get this committed in its present state.

2. The OpenJDK6 port may continue to be maintained by the community in terms
of security patches even though Oracle has EOL'ed JDK6.  Not clear yet if that
will happen, but the IcedTea people certainly have expressed some interest in
doing that.


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=179801