Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 18:20:52 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4=>6.1 regression: nforce2 vs. APIC [+fix] Message-ID: <446DE254.50103@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <200605191116.06248.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <446DD5EB.6030300@icyb.net.ua> <200605191116.06248.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 19/05/2006 18:16 John Baldwin said the following: > On Friday 19 May 2006 10:27, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> [Disclaimer, just in case: I do mean APIC, not ACPI] >> >> This is a good lesson for me for not trying any RCs or BETAs in due time. >> >> Short description of my system: nforce2 based motherboard NF-7 v2 with >> the latest BIOS (v2.7), CPU is Athlon XP. >> >> ... >> >> Based on that info and the linux patch in that thread I came up with the >> following PCI fixup. Now I am running 6.1 with both APIC and "C1 >> disconnect" enabled for 2 days without any problems. > > Good find! The patch looks good. I've modified it slight to expand > the comment and to make it more paranoid and only trigger for > bus/slot/function 0/0/0 like the post mentions along with a minor > tweak to the printf. Can you test to make sure I didn't break anything in the > process? Jon, sure, where can I find your version of the patch ? :-) -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?446DE254.50103>