From nobody Thu Sep 19 08:55:40 2024 X-Original-To: stable@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X8TrQ37h3z5Vcth for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@osfux.nl) Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (vm1982.osfux.nl [IPv6:2a03:5500:1724:55:79:99:187:212]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4X8TrP5PsVz4Hpn for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 08:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@osfux.nl) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B24A7F; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:55:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=osfux.nl; s=default; t=1726736141; bh=doI7cKPls5fvB7l6zPSsKjOqKgDAGiE1dD6AE6Ec764=; h=Date:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=QW+8fIr/h6GdBq9RjLtCYvQ4YBaO118Yragm4IZevrrw4+pErNfr+tZm1BU5u63aO IyeJWYqxto8gRVDA0MNzLlsIKvnYcjazmDo2OB+Za+724GDNBzN3Itk+PvcjMkn3oJ M5csardRW/2v655kowhgEjTynb6dg6MX9ZjSl+v2CErg5YXvr34mibutWk6mNTvwPC ol9lqY0esCIEemP1EX6r4+DV1mszilqFMZjFiP4Y3Sxgjz/O7PbKu4KTd62u/Ct/Da KdFHU3Y4rAGEIHR8droF/OOMQtqHZVS7UXxFmanDUqvPwXHiIn01Xi1i4PJnap61h4 PVxnojOJmIDHmbRfhVjB4dDgTkmgtqnyDMlmU6OCIsxvId31FafGRFvBBgdmMrPsXF vnuomp0U3r9uv5yj+TUbM38/BtNUX4rJh0VEu4xtCPUPJuf/Zm+wK9Fy2+cbobl1fI 3yIqGGnzxjxecHxcf4UZCbeVBGX32VjS4PHYIhj6BL9xqOFxE0rqpkHECHI1TlN8sc YeRmeQsIioiFplQmVyOcawRYAB2HqAj5nCn47R9vY9q5td6wvBDhcUPvjCTiwMz8nA WMORkObP90m8F0CrGojh4mzXprjP289/3IU5uw0FzuV+B4VfUyznFckOpMQRTgdSww zdyWarVP8DRCGrXU5QX5b5pw= X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none shortcircuit=no X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Received: from [0.0.0.0] (unknown [193.187.128.159]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:55:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2024 10:55:40 +0200 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-stable List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: issues with syslogd include redirecting wg0 output to custom location To: stable@freebsd.org, joachim@durchholz.org, steffen@sdaoden.eu References: <4250c967-61c7-419a-b542-455a8f655dd1@osfux.nl> <0019d1f0-0b84-448d-8ecd-5b1619103139@osfux.nl> <20240918225906.Npft_PNY@steffen%sdaoden.eu> <20240918230901.P2V-MyI6@steffen%sdaoden.eu> <627f0b4f-6d55-4872-9435-07109a9a6aa0@durchholz.org> Content-Language: en-US From: fuxjez In-Reply-To: <627f0b4f-6d55-4872-9435-07109a9a6aa0@durchholz.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8315, ipnet:2a03:5500::/31, country:NL] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4X8TrP5PsVz4Hpn X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated Hi Joachim/Steffen, That specific check was causing issues some time ago as well, removed it from my mail setup. Thanks for your feedback :) ruben On 9/19/24 10:17, Joachim Durchholz wrote: > On 19.09.24 01:09, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: >> Ha. >> >> Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in >>   <20240918225906.Npft_PNY@steffen%sdaoden.eu>: >> >> I got back >> >>    : host vm1982.osfux.nl[79.99.187.212] said: 554 >> 5.7.1 Service >>        unavailable; Client host [217.144.132.164] blocked using >> sbl.spamhaus.org; >>        Error: open resolver; https://check.spamhaus.org/returnc/ >> pub/141.101.75.8/ >>        (in reply to RCPT TO command) > > Oh, that's a problem on vm1982.osfux.nl, who rely on Spamhaus to > identify IP addresses that have sent spam in the past. > Spamhaus is pretty well-known for being unreliable; the spam filters in > your mail client work much better, and if they misclassify a mail you > can easily find it in the spam folder instead of rejecting the mail and > making life difficult for the admin on the sending side. > > Regards, > Jo >