From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 2 08:43:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22F516A41A; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from itchy.rabson.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:618:400::50b1:e8f2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2900313C4B6; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 08:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from [80.177.232.250] (herring.rabson.org [80.177.232.250]) by itchy.rabson.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l728gFDn089116; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:42:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) From: Doug Rabson To: Randy Bush In-Reply-To: <18097.22498.575342.155398@roam.psg.com> References: <46B01D5E.6050004@psg.com> <20070801110727.GC59008@menantico.com> <46B0EDEA.8050608@FreeBSD.org> <20070801211320.GE59008@menantico.com> <46B10A28.8000908@FreeBSD.org> <46B12E06.5030809@isc.org> <18097.22498.575342.155398@roam.psg.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 09:42:15 +0100 Message-Id: <1186044135.1264.23.camel@herring.rabson.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/3846/Wed Aug 1 08:27:07 2007 on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Doug Barton , FreeBSD Stable , Peter Losher , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: default dns config change causing major poolpah X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:43:17 -0000 On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 18:04 -1000, Randy Bush wrote: > > in addition nowhere does it state in RFC2870 that the root-servers have to > > accept AXFR's as part of their service. > > in fact, the opposite > > 2.7 Root servers SHOULD NOT answer AXFR, or other zone transfer, > queries from clients other than other root servers. This > restriction is intended to, among other things, prevent > unnecessary load on the root servers as advice has been heard > such as "To avoid having a corruptible cache, make your server a > stealth secondary for the root zone." The root servers MAY put > the root zone up for ftp or other access on one or more less > critical servers. I think this makes it completely clear that we should not be trying to use the AXFR service from any of the root servers. Expert users can do what they like but making our default configuration use a service which is documented in the current best practices document as being unsupported seems foolish.