Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 11:12:33 -0700 From: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> To: Gary Kline <kline@thought.org> Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OOo-1.1.1 snafu: perl5??? Message-ID: <49E41220-97AD-11D8-B4C2-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040426180648.GC21511@tao.thought.org> References: <20040426005847.GA71814@tao.thought.org> <20040426081610.GB50470@gee.kz> <A3FC8462-97A8-11D8-B4C2-000A956B6386@FreeBSD.org> <20040426180648.GC21511@tao.thought.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Apr 26, 2004, at 11:06, Gary Kline wrote: > Well, I can do the symbolic ln by hand, no biggie. But do > I still need perl5 at all? I haven't used perl4 since the > flood... . The problem here is that after a use.perl port, /usr/bin/perl points to the port-installed version of perl, but /usr/bin/perl5 (which some code looks for in preference to /usr/bin/perl), is still pointing at the system perl binaries. > What's the URL to retrieve this patch? Or if it's small > enough I can hand patch. Same as with any PR: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=65554 -aDe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49E41220-97AD-11D8-B4C2-000A956B6386>