From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 21 23:26:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B595A16A4B3 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web14310.mail.yahoo.com (web14310.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.224.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAEFF43FDF for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:26:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carhore@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030922062617.78369.qmail@web14310.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.8.252.35] by web14310.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:26:17 PDT Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 23:26:17 -0700 (PDT) From: CarHore To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Packages required by openoffice-1.1RC4.tgz X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 06:26:18 -0000 Hello, previous versions of the OO package required no other packages, and so could presumably be installed on any 4.x system. The 1.1RC4 package looks like it depends on quite a few packages, according to "pkg_info -r". Is this correct and intentional? The required version numbers of some of the required packages, such as libmng, glib, gettext, gtk, and ORBit, are greater than the version numbers of those packages as of 4.8-RELEASE. Is it correct to say that 1.1RC4 is no longer installable in any stock 4.x system, or even a stock 4.8-RELEASE system, but requires a 4.8-STABLE system, as far as package versions are concerned? There seem to be several version conflicts. For example, according to "pkg_info -r", 1.1RC4 requires both gettext-0.12.1 and gettext-0.11.5_1. Does that make sense? Other examples (where "-->" means "requires"): --> lcms-1.09 --> libmng-1.0.5_1 --> lcms-1.09,1 --> libiconv-1.8_2 --> gettext-0.12.1 --> libiconv-1.9.1_1 --> imake-4.3.0 --> gtk-1.2.10_10 --> imake-4.3.0_1 --> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_1 --> gtk-1.2.10_10 --> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 --> fontconfig-2.1_6 --> gtk-1.2.10_10 --> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 --> fontconfig-2.2.90_3 --> freetype2-2.1.3_1 --> gtk-1.2.10_10 --> XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 --> fontconfig-2.2.90_3 --> freetype2-2.1.4_1 Are these a problem for the FreeBSD package system, or for correct running of 1.1RC4? Is it an option to install 1.1RC4 forcibly (pkg_add -f) and its required packages but at their versions as of 4.8-RELEASE, instead of 4.8-STABLE, to keep all version numbers consistent at 4.8-RELEASE. Would that work? TIA __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com