From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 15 12:59:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from aladdin.com (aladdin.com [209.157.132.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E74437B423; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ghost@aladdin.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by aladdin.com (8.10.1/8.9.1) id f4FJgOl11481; Tue, 15 May 2001 12:42:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lamp.aladdin.com(10.0.0.4), claiming to be "aladdin.com" via SMTP by sand.aladdin.com, id smtpdt16839; Tue May 15 12:42:21 2001 Received: (from ghost@localhost) by aladdin.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id NAA01514; Tue, 15 May 2001 13:02:29 -0700 Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:02:29 -0700 Message-Id: <200105152002.NAA01514@aladdin.com> From: "L. Peter Deutsch" To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: kellyzg@hotmail.com, ports@freebsd.org, andreas@freebsd.org, raph@artofcode.com, jseger@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <200105151806.f4FI6Yr26882@misha.privatelabs.com> Subject: Re: GhostScript and JPEG References: <200105151806.f4FI6Yr26882@misha.privatelabs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > My understanding is, no. To produce a non-compliant jpeg, you need the > value of C_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU (Compress) increased. D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU > is for the Decompressor. > ... I think it is safe to bump up D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU. I agree. D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU, which affects only decompression, should be increased; C_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU should stay the same. Neither the PostScript spec nor Adobe compatibility requires the ability to *produce* non-compliant JPEG data. Ghostscript only needs to be able to *read* non-compliant data. -- L. Peter Deutsch | Aladdin Enterprises | 203 Santa Margarita Ave. ghost@aladdin.com | http://www.aladdin.com | Menlo Park, CA 94025 The future of software is at http://www.opensource.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message