Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:23:15 -0600 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> Cc: Ryan Stone <rysto32@gmail.com>, freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Allowing a local subnet route to change to a different ifnet Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK0VKuT28FCrHnK=pJBHS%2B=6uymgKcTC9KqRHBWn=_8Now@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAOtMX2jQ6Nxk%2BhuDmqQecZ8AjS0fo=vpA4C_RZ8ebTCDfKuPdA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFMmRNwmyMBZ2gmhu4ki22xUeBYcaJqzXzPLfdQhdpj0AzqW0g@mail.gmail.com> <CAOtMX2jQ6Nxk%2BhuDmqQecZ8AjS0fo=vpA4C_RZ8ebTCDfKuPdA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org> wrote: > I'm sorry for you Ryan; this sounds like a doozy. I know you said that the > customer is unwilling to change, but would they consider using a lagg(4) > interface? Using lagg with laggproto=failover is designed to solve exactly > this problem. They wouldn't have to recable anything, and they could keep > their single IP address. > What single IP address and what does cabling have to do with it? -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK0VKuT28FCrHnK=pJBHS%2B=6uymgKcTC9KqRHBWn=_8Now>