From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:25:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF02816A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:25:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5EDA43D45; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:25:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0ADPg1g004526; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:25:42 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF13D115C6; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:24:14 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:24:14 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Pav Lucistnik Message-ID: <20060110132414.GA2632@flame.pc> References: <200601081837.k08IblYG046281@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060108201242.GA81500@abigail.blackend.org> <1136795917.34110.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136795917.34110.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, Marc Fonvieille , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/advocacy myths.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:25:45 -0000 On 2006-01-09 09:38, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > +
  • > > + DragonflyBSD started as a code fork from > > > > (For style consistency) we should not wrap like this the content of > > tags. > > It's done in many other pages. It's wrong in those other pages too. Spurious whitespace may result in line breaks that are totally unwanted, which may be silly in places like this, for example: Some text that will not wrap correctly right about here [1] This depends on the browser, of course, but it's one of those things I tend to notice in many online documents. It always looks ugly.