From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 30 18:41:41 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B311065672;
	Fri, 30 May 2008 18:41:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFE78FC1C;
	Fri, 30 May 2008 18:41:41 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192)
	id 8612F1A4D81; Fri, 30 May 2008 11:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 11:41:41 -0700
From: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>
To: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20080530184141.GG48790@elvis.mu.org>
References: <483FA1C0.2010506@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <483FA1C0.2010506@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i
Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: pthread_cleanup_push as a macro
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 18:41:41 -0000

* David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> [080529 23:40] wrote:
> I would like to make pthread_cleanup_push and pthread_cleanup_pop as a
> pair of macros, the current implementation has to malloc() and free() a
> pthread_cleanup memory block everytime, this is slow, the new one
> simply uses stack space, note that other OSes have already done it in 
> this way. The patch keeps old functions and should not have binary
> compatible problem.
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~davidxu/patch/pthread_cleanup_push.patch

Heh, when I had to use QNX on a project this totally confused
me, but if others are doing it then go for it.

Does Solaris do it?

-Alfred