From owner-freebsd-current Tue Jan 5 11:23:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA23168 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:23:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA23162 for ; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 11:23:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA20875; Tue, 5 Jan 1999 20:20:45 +0100 (CET) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: jbg@masterplan.org (Jason George), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: News Server In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jan 1999 11:14:19 PST." <6309.915563659@zippy.cdrom.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1999 20:20:44 +0100 Message-ID: <20873.915564044@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <6309.915563659@zippy.cdrom.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: >> But why don't we just create a >> freebsd.* >> hierachy for selective and elective distribution ? > >Because I believe that requires buy-in by the backbone cabal, and >who wants to spend 3 weeks mud-wrestling with Joel Furr? :-) I don't really see the need, people can pick it up someplace and if they don't want it they can say no. I guess alt.freebsd.* could be a more legal alternative ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message