From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 12:46:11 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121851065688
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:46:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mgamsjager@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.220.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6D58FC1C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:46:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vcbfy7 with SMTP id fy7so4868690vcb.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc
	:content-type; bh=bOfIv3Tcp/fCLmBrtHQDj430l5MvouJzCfWMAV2iHq0=;
	b=GsA75nx4NQzaXax9i9jLrTPyYo0fwVKCb8HaASh4ABgNJoCxw63/c6ILZdlR+/SOgQ
	3VO05ysrQYiG7AvV78T9GL8NlgRsF6a2MXbgG7NSUrSdKSOh2PSnQfbYVOBS9dll0Rgd
	UrW9vQBvLI91NND0Z6AbPHIBldXiJKwNKPxMOnO4fRsAFqzxBPBvs1urZagYPllh1kzf
	7/NLdbYA4CldgGZQqm9ShqnczTMDIDJn27Ob1Kt8m2icJmVdGJqGA+Ikcy2GP/eCSWVe
	fWtUlyoDF4I13X5jB1mTWS5fzs/tnCttfJxCg7oco5Pm6rJYOSZTEGQSgx9ttlRm9vsb
	yHNQ==
Received: by 10.220.8.17 with SMTP id f17mr11582740vcf.11.1340196370102; Wed,
	20 Jun 2012 05:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.172.199 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 05:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org>
	<402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de>
	<20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at>
	<4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com>
	<CAH3a3KWHYC+pbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1340192731894-5720039.post@n5.nabble.com>
	<4FE1BD0E.5060300@pukruppa.de>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206201416540.24484@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
From: Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:45:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+D9Qhvc1A4e7Koec5DP6Mo-PTmNW7X9kvC4XVBHzr-zAuBFYg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:46:11 -0000

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Wojciech Puchar <
wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

> Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me,
>>> but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
>>> mailing list at all.
>>>
>> Actually I can't remember any flame-war about system compilers - this is
>> the first one.
>>
>
> because such situation like now never happened - changing C compiler to
> much worse because of political reasons.
>
>
>  But I believe it is a good proof, that clang is a serious alternative to
>> gcc
>>
> it is only a proof that it was decided to put it as FreeBSD default
> compiler.
>
>
Everything is said, explained and discusse why this decision is made.. So
what do you want? that someone says"  Yes you are right clang is shit?".
If you like it or not: Clang will stay but leaves the choice which compiler
you use up to you.