Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:29:47 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Cc: Mathieu Prevot <mathieu_prevot@yahoo.fr> Subject: Re: ACPI errors on amd64 (sempron) Message-ID: <200510272029.48815.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <43616BFF.1040709@root.org> References: <971FCB6690CD0E4898387DBF7552B90E0323D7B6@orsmsx403.amr.corp.intel.com> <200510271744.17558.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <43616BFF.1040709@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:08 pm, Nate Lawson wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > It's already fixed in (soon to be imported) ACPICA-20051021 code. > > There's no way we can get acpi-ca tested in -current and MFC'd > before 6.0. Instead, we should MFC just the logic Intel changed in > the header file to 6.0. IMHO, I think there's not enough time to do any fix at this point. I think we should fix it *after* 6.0-RELEASE because it only fixes half of his problem. In fact, I have seen somebody else had similar problem: http://bsdforum.or.kr/viewtopic.php?p=5414#5414 It's Korean BSD User Forum but you may be able to read this: pci_link26: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145771032.1.INTA is invalid pci_link21: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145771032.2.INTA is invalid pci_link27: BIOS IRQ 3 for -2145771032.2.INTB is invalid pci_link23: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145771032.10.INTA is invalid pci_link24: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145771032.4.INTA is invalid pci_link29: BIOS IRQ 11 for -2145771032.7.INTA is invalid pci_link30: BIOS IRQ 10 for -2145771032.8.INTA is invalid Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200510272029.48815.jkim>