From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 5 17:06:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FA11065670 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com) Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com [38.99.187.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77D58FC1B for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 17:06:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.10.199] (unknown [172.16.10.199]) by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 97A785646C for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:06:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C32112A.8030606@intertainservices.com> Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 13:06:50 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100512 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4C2DC06C.6060301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4C2DC06C.6060301@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 97A785646C.AF103 X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: tomcat 7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 17:06:55 -0000 On 7/2/2010 6:33 AM, Alex Dupre wrote: > Hi All, > I prepared a port for the new beta (7.0.0) release of apache tomcat 7. > The tarball is available here: http://www.alexdupre.com/tomcat7.tar.gz > The current tomcat6 port is full of (IMHO) useless variables and > variable substitutions, so I decided to cut them down and simplify the > port a lot. Test it, if you are interested. > > Thanks for the port. It looks like you droped support for the tomcat60_user variable (which user to run tomcat as), this is quite useful here. Any particular reason for this?