From owner-svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org Sun May 29 19:06:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-vendor@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFC6B530D2; Sun, 29 May 2016 19:06:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 200001005; Sun, 29 May 2016 19:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id 762KbbQbaBLFm762Lbqfwx; Sun, 29 May 2016 13:06:10 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=W5d6blek c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=yrkiwgmsf1kA:10 a=VxmjJ2MpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=dg3j_vcu91Rqpd1L6HcA:9 a=7gXAzLPJhVmCkEl4_tsf:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=pxhY87DP9d2VeQe4joPk:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A89313751; Sun, 29 May 2016 12:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4TJ67AT082836; Sun, 29 May 2016 12:06:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201605291906.u4TJ67AT082836@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Cy Schubert cc: Pedro Giffuni , Cy Schubert , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r300961 - vendor/one-true-awk/dist In-Reply-To: Message from Cy Schubert of "Sun, 29 May 2016 11:17:49 -0700." <201605291817.u4TIHnN7040344@slippy.cwsent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 12:06:07 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfJ4QudghKroVlQYD6E5Y4oKLaDSIXe6qixWJlu7+WjAruluZSb1wDZrjGxcHKCa4QsjRo1TJNyIccxWkfSBsgoJqAYkOc+X02BMQS123O2uFOfQTgiqp REHfgavg60bIuTXXPIyYzs7lxCfLkGqxc8Rkd+HzOLp+gTOYg2DB+OrPP+Ir1i2R2yhBLrvjA6I3SnUpqEDgPuhUAE1oOGtkTV4JJz+fjeRlvDBUL6Lw9oW/ V2uALGwy7jGATegWv344q3DdnuHiKqyrY1Vf2gWMn/zKfC6uZsBTjQEq+xpNS7Q9 X-BeenThere: svn-src-vendor@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the vendor work area tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 19:06:12 -0000 In message <201605291817.u4TIHnN7040344@slippy.cwsent.com>, Cy Schubert writes: > In message <574B2EAC.3010908@FreeBSD.org>, Pedro Giffuni writes: > > > > > > > > On 29/05/2016 12:37, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > In message <201605291618.u4TGItNJ024583@repo.freebsd.org>, "Pedro F. > > > Giffuni" w > > > rites: > > >> Author: pfg > > >> Date: Sun May 29 16:18:55 2016 > > >> New Revision: 300961 > > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300961 > > >> > > >> Log: > > >> one-true-awk: replace 0 with NULL for pointers > > >> > > >> Also remove a redundant semicolon. > > >> Submitted upstream already. > > >> > > >> Modified: > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/b.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/lex.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/maketab.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/parse.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/run.c > > >> vendor/one-true-awk/dist/tran.c > > >> > > > Was this commit and r300962 obtained from the upline or vendor or were > > > these commits local to FreeBSD only? > > > > > > > > There is no public awk public repository AFAICT, but bwk acknowledged > > the submission. > > > > The change to openresolv was merged to the public repository. > > As they've acknowledged the submissions, can you please tag the new > versions of awk and openresolve with the correct upstream version numbers, > please? Additionally, if there are no new version numbers, what reason is there for polluting the vendor branch with local patches to it? Is not the vendor branch for virgin code retrieved (or received) from the vendor (or upline)? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert or FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.