From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan  4 20:22:13 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D8CA716A4CE; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 20:22:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C31A643D53; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 20:22:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mux@freebsd.org)
Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1920)
	id B98CD5C9CB; Tue,  4 Jan 2005 12:22:13 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:22:13 +0100
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To: Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20050104202213.GC63028@elvis.mu.org>
References: <200501042007.j04K7Ch1043130@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200501042007.j04K7Ch1043130@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/nologin nologin.c
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:22:14 -0000

Xin LI wrote:
> delphij     2005-01-04 20:07:12 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     usr.sbin/nologin     nologin.c 
>   Log:
>   Use __unused macro instead of a bare void for main().
>   
>   Suggested by:   nectar

I bet there is a reason behind this, but I'm totally puzzled at why you
would do such a thing.  It was much prettier and more "C" before.  Could
you shed some light on this please?

Cheers,
Maxime