From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 12:42:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC8E131 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:42:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 921728FC12 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 12:42:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Footer: b3NlLm5s Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)) for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Nov 2012 13:42:39 +0100 Message-ID: <509662BE.3070600@ose.nl> Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 13:42:38 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO References: <20121103190930.GA23145@icarus.home.lan> <5095B89F.4070705@freebsd.org> <20121104.211336.244701604.hatanou@infolab.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20121104.211336.244701604.hatanou@infolab.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2012 12:42:44 -0000 On 11/04/2012 01=3A13 PM=2C HATANO Tomomi wrote=3A =3E Hi all=2E =3E =3E The point is=3A =3E =3E There is completely no way to take a snapshot of SU+J partition =3E unless modify one=27s kernel=2E =3E =3E Whether some issue still exist or not=2C =3E how about enabling snapshoting SU+J partition =3E through sysctl variable=3F =3E =3E Would you mind to see patch attached=3F =3E =3E 1=2E Taking a snapshot of SU+J partition is controlled through sysctl v= ariable=2E =3E =3E 2=2E Default to disable=2E =3E One who want to enable it should set the variable manually=2E =3E =3E 3=2E The default value in bsdinstall=288=29 may be left as is=2E Hi If I understand correctly this still leaves your default installed=20 system with SU+J and if you set the sysctl variable it means okay I am=20= prepared for trouble when taking a snapshot of a SU+J filesystem=3F Why would I want a sysctl variable that gives me known trouble=3F Or have I misread your patch=3F When taking a snapshot of a SU+J filesystem we already get the nice not=20= supported error instead of getting into trouble=2E I think SU+J should not be default unless it works fine with the rest of=20= the system as described in the handbook=2E This e-mail message=2C including any attachment=28s=29=2C is intended solel= y for the addressee or addressees=2E Any views or opinions presented herein= are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of O= SE=2E If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please return t= his e-mail message and the attachment=28s=29 to the sender and delete and d= estroy all copies=2E