From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 14:09:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A25106566C; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AA28FC13; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id QAA01198; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:09:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4D0B6F27.5020700@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:09:43 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Best References: <20101217115526.GA20772@freebsd.org> <20101217120955.00005f5a@unknown> <20101217121731.GA29863@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20101217121731.GA29863@freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "camcontrol identify ada0" and "diskinfo -v ada0" reporting different cylinders count X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:09:47 -0000 on 17/12/2010 14:17 Alexander Best said the following: > On Fri Dec 17 10, Bruce Cran wrote: >> See >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2010-December/023134.html >> for a (very!) detailed discussion of the various ways of calculating >> CHS values. Unfortunately no decision was reached so it looks like >> we're going to have a mismatch between camcontrol, diskinfo, geom, cam >> and ata for a while yet. > > too bad. :( thanks for the link. i'll try to read through the entire thread, > although i'm quite sure that the really techie details are too complicated for > me to comprehend. Why do you care about $subj anyway? :) -- Andriy Gapon