Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:26:29 -0500
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: RFC: Restructure of the front page
Message-ID:  <3FCBB205.7070709@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031201161409.2c2729ee.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20031201133128.1eee8ecf.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> <3FCBA2A7.2060708@potentialtech.com> <20031201161409.2c2729ee.trhodes@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tom Rhodes wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 15:20:55 -0500
> Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> wrote:

<snip>

>>I only have one question: why add a new link seperate from the link
>>to send-per.html ... I thought the general consensus during the
>>previous disucssions was to change the "Send a bug report" link.
>>It just goes against my nature to leave a link up that points to
>>a page that basically says, "under construction/not working right
>>now"
> 
> Ceri is working on getting the send-pr.sgml file reactivated.

I guess my point is that I feel only a single link is required
(even after the send-pr.sgml file is reactivated) and that it
should point to the article.  I suspect that people who use
the send-pr form frequently will make a bookmark to it, so those
who are trying to get to it from the home page should be
"encouraged" to read up on proper procedure before submitting.

But I may be out of line on this?

Can you provide a pointer to the discussion on -www?  I wasn't
able to find it searching the archive, but I may have been looking
for the wrong thing.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FCBB205.7070709>