From owner-cvs-all Sun Jun 28 14:02:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA08889 for cvs-all-outgoing; Sun, 28 Jun 1998 14:02:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pluto.plutotech.com (mail.plutotech.com [206.168.67.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA08877 for ; Sun, 28 Jun 1998 14:02:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gibbs@plutotech.com) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by pluto.plutotech.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA24964; Sun, 28 Jun 1998 15:01:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199806282101.PAA24964@pluto.plutotech.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Mike Smith cc: Harlan Stenn , committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: contrib-utized am-utils? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Jun 1998 21:52:00 PDT." <199806280452.VAA17306@antipodes.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 14:56:39 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk >eg. Do you have anyone testing am-utils as contribified in a production >environment? (Is the committer going to get flamed for committing >something that's busted?) How does configuration change for the new >tools (if it does)? Do we have any conversion documentation (if >required)? > >I'd like to work with you on this, I just need more data. Someone should also look at the NetBSD integration of am-utils and ensure that we aren't missing any fixes. If there are differences, they shoule be submitted back to the maintainers of am-utils. >-- >\\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith >\\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au >\\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org >\\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com > > > -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message