From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Jul  1 01:42:05 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA19076
          for chat-outgoing; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 01:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from radford.i-plus.net (root@Radford.i-Plus.net [206.99.237.6])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id BAA19069
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 1 Jul 1997 01:42:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from abyss.i-Plus.net (stderr@SandCastle.i-Plus.net [206.99.237.44])
	by radford.i-plus.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA13062;
	Tue, 1 Jul 1997 04:40:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199707010840.EAA13062@radford.i-plus.net>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.0544.0
From: "Troy Settle" <rewt@i-Plus.net>
To: <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        "Annelise Anderson" <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>
Subject: Re: Why Not Make tcsh the default shell?
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 1997 04:44:38 -0400
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE Engine V4.71.0544.0
Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

From: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>
>Why does FreeBSD install csh as the default shell instead of tcsh?

I really don't want to help start a shell war, but the same question could
be asked about bash.  Personally, I use sh for scripts because it's always
there... but, I much prefer bash to any other shell. (guess you could say
that Linux ruined me for life :)