From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 12 17:25:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF3616A417 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:25:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E518C43CD7 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:16:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@collaborativefusion.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com [192.168.2.61]) (SSL: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:17:14 -0500 id 00056414.457EE41A.00006639 Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:17:14 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: hackers@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20061212121714.a3fbb61b.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> Organization: Collaborative Fusion X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.10.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: shmmax tops out at 2G? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:25:02 -0000 [I sent this to questions@ yesterday and have yet to get a response. I suspect it may be a little more technical than questions@] uname -a FreeBSD db00.lab00 6.2-BETA3 FreeBSD 6.2-BETA3 #1: Fri Dec 8 09:27:37 EST 2006 root@db00.lab00:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DB-2850-amd64 amd64 sysctl kern.ipc.shmmax=2200000000 kern.ipc.shmmax: 2100000000 -> -2094967296 Looks like an unsigned 32-bit int. That doesn't seem to scale as well as would be expected on 64-bit arch (or PAE for that matter). Is this a mistake, or intentional? I'm working with some big memory systems, and I sure would like to allocate more than 2G for PostgreSQL to use ... -- Bill Moran Collaborative Fusion Inc.