From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 17 15:26:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ED116A41A for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from mx-outbound01.easydns.com (mailout.easydns.com [205.210.42.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B1913C44B for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists-fbsd@shadypond.com) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (69-12-173-117.static.humboldt1.com [69.12.173.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx-outbound01.easydns.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0177FB3 for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:26:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from slider.shadypond.com (slider.shadypond.com [192.168.1.11]) by slider.shadypond.com (postoffice) with ESMTP id 42B9FB65AD for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:26:05 +0000 (UTC) From: Pollywog To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:26:04 +0000 References: <200710171516.53473.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> In-Reply-To: <200710171516.53473.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710171526.04181.lists-fbsd@shadypond.com> Subject: Re: xmh port in 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 15:26:07 -0000 On Wednesday 17 October 2007 15:16:53 Pollywog wrote: > I am doing an upgrade of ports in FreeBSD 6.2 and apparently xmh is no > longer part of the Ports collection, but when I saw "yes" to remove it, > portmanager complains that it is required by xorg and xfce. What is the > problem here, anyone know? That came out wrong. When I say "yes" to the removal of xmh, portmanager complains it is required by those other ports.