From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 21 07:56:38 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A4816A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:56:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vs3.bgnett.no (vs3.bgnett.no [194.54.96.185])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AA943D1F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:56:37 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from peter@bgnett.no)
Received: from amidala.datadok.no.bgnett.no (amidala.datadok.no
	[194.54.103.98])
	by vs3.bgnett.no (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2L7uPBM069892;
	Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:56:26 +0100 (CET)	(envelope-from peter@bgnett.no)
To: "Eugene M. Minkovskii" <emin@mccme.ru>
References: <20050320093159.GA3213@mccme.ru>
	<861xaamf9t.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> <20050321071227.GA29429@mccme.ru>
From: peter@bgnett.no (Peter N. M. Hansteen)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:54:35 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20050321071227.GA29429@mccme.ru> (Eugene M. Minkovskii's
 message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:12:38 +0300")
Message-ID: <86eke9fn7o.fsf@amidala.datadok.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp,
 berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-bgnett.no-virusscanner: Found to be clean
X-Envelope-To: emin@mccme.ru, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: OpenBSD's pf and traffic
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:56:38 -0000

"Eugene M. Minkovskii" <emin@mccme.ru> writes:

> block in log on $ext_ip inet from any to $ext_ip label $ext_ip
> pass  in     on $ext_ip inet from any to $ext_ip port 22 keep sate
>
> As you can see, ssh packets match to all rule and pass in because
> last rule win. Does it mean, that I can't see ssh's packet using
> command
> # pfctl -sl

here you label the blocked packets but not the ones you pass, which
means your ssh packets would count toward the packets passed counter only.

> And if I use
>
> block in log on $ext_ip inet from any to $ext_ip label $ext_ip
> pass  in     on $ext_ip inet from any to $ext_ip port 22 keep sate label $ext_ip
>
> ... I see label twice ?

No. But both rules would increment the $ext_ip counter, which means that
your $ext_ip counter would be essentially packet totals. Last matching
rule wins (with state instead of sate it would work), so each packet
increments the relevant counters only once.

> Perhaps you know where I can find workable example of this?

Randal Schwartz has a nice article called "Monitoring Net Traffic with
OpenBSD's Packet Filter" at http://www.samag.com/documents/s=9053/sam0403j/0403j.htm

-- 
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team
http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/
"First, we kill all the spammers" The Usenet Bard, "Twice-forwarded tales"