From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 24 20:42:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3140116A403 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:42:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD02243D53 for ; Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:42:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from boole.maths.tcd.ie ([134.226.81.15] helo=boole.maths.tcd.ie) by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 24 Nov 2006 20:42:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=maths.tcd.ie) by boole.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 24 Nov 2006 20:42:46 +0000 (GMT) To: "O. Hartmann" In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Nov 2006 08:22:39 +0100." <45669DBF.5030009@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Request-Do: Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:42:46 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200611242042.aa66912@boole.maths.tcd.ie> Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: UFS Bug: FreeBSD 6.1/6.2/7.0: MOKB-08-11-2006, CVE-2006-5824, MOKB-03-11-2006, CVE-2006-5679 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 20:42:52 -0000 > These two bugs are shown for FreeBSD only and I guess, Solaris and other > BSDs still use UFS. Are they more robust against this exploit or type > of exploit? I don't know of a concerted effort by anyone to improve UFS in this way. I would guess that the odd bug would have been resolved, but no large scale work. David.