From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 12 13:32:24 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D497137B401; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B00C43F85; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:32:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 02D712ED3CF; Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:32:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 13:32:23 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Michael Sierchio Message-ID: <20030412203223.GA18848@elvis.mu.org> References: <3E976EBD.C3E66EF8@tel.fer.hr> <3E985D19.1070206@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E985D19.1070206@tenebras.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: mckusick@McKusick.COM cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH: Forcible delaying of UFS (soft)updates X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 20:32:25 -0000 * Michael Sierchio [030412 11:38] wrote: > Marko Zec wrote: > > >- fsync() no longer flushes the buffers to disk, but returns immediately > >instead; > > Any system that does this should be flushed down the toilet. Softupdates > already breaks transaction semantics of FFS by breaking > link()/unlink()/rename() > etc. How does it do that?