Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 08:20:07 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RFC: unit_list routines Message-ID: <78440.990598807@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 May 2001 22:53:26 -0300." <3B0B1816.729E3928@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3B0B1816.729E3928@newsguy.com>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Brian Somers wrote: >> >> I can't see any way of deriving the two from any common set of >> routines either - the resource_list stuff needs a hierarchy by it's >> nature, and I guess the ``count'' bits are intended (eventually) for >> handling limited resources such as power - not really applicable to >> unit allocation. >> >> Maybe I'm missing something though ? > >Isn't what you want precisely what md does (at least on current)? nope. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78440.990598807>