From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 15 17:07:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF367F7 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4D52B52 for ; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49536 invoked by uid 80); 15 Jun 2014 17:07:07 -0000 Received: from dsdf-4d0a7f17.pool.mediaWays.net (dsdf-4d0a7f17.pool.mediaWays.net [77.10.127.23]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 19:07:07 +0200 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 19:07:07 +0200 Message-ID: <20140615190707.Horde.m1qf4NFL1deNrXB5utbrfQ4@avocado.salatschuessel.net> From: Oliver Lehmann To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: svn commit: r355394 - head/Mk References: <201405261549.s4QFn5Gp006957@svn.freebsd.org> <20140614124110.Horde.r44J3TFoohymIGGIP-mDmg2@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <20140614221802.GB4747@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140615103823.Horde.Lwc5YDdlbMyTx8bkt1JtAA2@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <20140615141347.GH4747@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140615141347.GH4747@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H5 (6.1.7) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 17:07:09 -0000 Hi Bapt, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Given ther eis only one tolau++ and which main binary is bin/tolua++ I don't > think it is worth adding it into lua.mk that is why I didn't add it > in the first > place. > > If you think that is wrong please tell me. It's fine as it is now - I can live with the current solution. Thanks, Oliver