From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 29 14:57:00 2011
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06004106566C;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:57:00 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from hselasky@freebsd.org)
Received: from swip.net (mailfe01.c2i.net [212.247.154.2])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E5F8FC08;
	Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:56:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 []
X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=wJvnH89EauZH5CtPccDXCoR3S15XcsUHhRLViNeYhtc=
	c=1 sm=1 a=SvYTsOw2Z4kA:10 a=Bjjt3Ia5OwMA:10 a=dBRESv0yCI8A:10
	a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10
	a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=D77xU_VBKiNl670GMyQA:9
	a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117
Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO
	laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org)
	by mailfe01.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19)
	with ESMTPA id 172968065; Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:56:56 +0200
Received-SPF: softfail receiver=mailfe01.swip.net; client-ip=188.126.198.129;
	envelope-from=hselasky@freebsd.org
From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org>
To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:54:22 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; )
References: <201108291627.42477.hselasky@freebsd.org>
	<4E5BA31C.7070103@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E5BA31C.7070103@FreeBSD.org>
X-Face: *nPdTl_}RuAI6^PVpA02T?$%Xa^>@hE0uyUIoiha$pC:9TVgl.Oq, NwSZ4V"|LR.+tj}g5
	%V,x^qOs~mnU3]Gn; cQLv&.N>TrxmSFf+p6(30a/{)KUU!s}w\IhQBj}[g}bj0I3^glmC(
	:AuzV9:.hESm-x4h240C`9=w
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201108291654.23054.hselasky@freebsd.org>
Cc: "svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org>,
	"svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>,
	"src-committers@FreeBSD.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r223989 - head/sys/dev/usb/input
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
	<svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
	<mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 14:57:00 -0000

On Monday 29 August 2011 16:33:00 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Not sure if this answers my question, which is not about pause vs
> ukbd_yield, but is about ukbd_yield vs kern_yield.
> In other words, why you couldn't simply use kern_yield where you used
> ukbd_yield?

Is this a new function. I think I used the following as an example:

void
uio_yield(void)
{
        struct thread *td;

        td = curthread;
        DROP_GIANT();
        thread_lock(td);
        sched_prio(td, td->td_user_pri);
        mi_switch(SW_INVOL | SWT_RELINQUISH, NULL);
        thread_unlock(td);
        PICKUP_GIANT();
}

As long as the kern_yield() lets the USB worker threads and XHCI interrupts 
run it should be fine. pause() is better though.

--HPS