From owner-cvs-all Wed Oct 17 9:41:42 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9A737B403; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 09:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.11.6/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f9HGcfZ04018; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:38:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200110171638.f9HGcfZ04018@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:38:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc group master.passwd To: rwatson@FreeBSD.org Cc: ache@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200110171532.f9HFWPZ03294@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Fixing my typo: On 17 Oct, I wrote: > Third, I don't think the Apache port needs to install the user on > systems, which don't have it already. If they already have Apache > installed (previous version), there will be plenty of work for them to > do anyway -- manually setting the permissions. It would be better, - IMHO, if Apache did start for them at all (with the uknown user + IMHO, if Apache did NOT start for them at all (with the uknown user > error), than if it started, but began failing on _some_ pages. The > port should just warn them, I think. Sorry... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message